Performance and Core Web Vitals
Finding out why a site is slow and fixing the cause, including the parts that live on the server rather than in the page.
The engineering half of search: making a site crawlable, indexable, fast, and unambiguous about what each page is.
Technical SEO is the part of search that is engineering rather than marketing: can search engines reach your pages, do they understand what each one is, and is there anything preventing them from indexing what matters.
It is unglamorous and it is where the largest fixable problems usually are. A site with excellent content and a robots rule blocking its own stylesheet is not a content problem.
Not what the sitemap claims. Server logs and Search Console show which pages are fetched, how often, and what was returned — which is frequently not what anyone expected.
Uppercase variants, missing trailing slashes, index.php, tracking parameters and both www and non-www all serving the same content splits a page's standing across several addresses. Consolidating it is often the single biggest technical win.
Structured data describing content a visitor cannot see is a manual-action risk. FAQ schema without visible questions, or review markup without reviews, is not worth the exposure.
More pages on a badly structured site produces more badly structured pages. Architecture first.
This is the technical half. It does not include link building, and it does not include producing large volumes of content. Where content is the actual constraint, that gets said plainly rather than sold technical work that will not move anything. There are also no ranking guarantees here — anyone offering them is describing something they do not control.
Technical fixes can take effect quickly once pages are recrawled, but the timing depends on how often your site is crawled and how competitive the terms are. Anyone giving you a specific date is guessing.
No, and it would be dishonest to. What can be guaranteed is that the technical obstacles are found and fixed, and that you are told which ones actually mattered.
It is necessary and it is not always sufficient. It removes what is holding a site back; whether that is enough depends on the content and the competition, and that assessment is part of the work.
Finding out why a site is slow and fixing the cause, including the parts that live on the server rather than in the page.
Websites built as code rather than assembled from a page builder — so they stay fast, stay indexable, and can still be changed in five years.
Ongoing care for sites and applications, so problems are found before a customer finds them.
Describe the problem and you will get a direct answer about whether it is worth doing, roughly what it involves, and what it would take.
Start a conversation